Discussion about this post

User's avatar
v23325's avatar

The problem is the word occupied.

Occupied means under control of a hostile army / entity.

Many of the people you are talking about are democratically elected officials.

All people in positions of power can be swayed by financial incentives. If you take issue with that then deal with all ways this type of influence is wielded.

Many different groups and nations influence American politicians and politics, the disproportionate emphasis and derogatory language used to speak about Jews and zionists is why ZOG is a shitty hill to die on.

While you may be willing to take this risk, you are taking a risk on behalf of the Jewish people while also using so much irony that it is hard for the average viewer to discern your intentions.

If you’re sincerely concerned about the ways that outside groups influence American politics it would be nice to see you explore how other countries and groups play a role.

While you may not think it is one United States interest to align with Israel, I think there is a case that can be made that the US benefits from this relationship too and is not “occupied” but rather it is a choice that you do not agree with. But the words matters and I’d argue that there is no occupation.

Expand full comment
mvtt's avatar

I stopped reading when one of your links was a clip of a Tucker Carlson interview. Show me a source that isn't a literal disinformation machine. Thanks.

Expand full comment
5 more comments...

No posts