Peterson would prolly call these gods, and then the mediator or ego ur talking about would be the highest god like yahweh or whatever. But how can I know that the thing doing the mediating is that, and not some usurper imitating it? Isn’t that like the whole gnostic problem
Sometimes they call It inconscious, sometimes they call them archetypes, sometimes they call them cognitive schemese. Here in the swamps we call It THE VOID.
I'm fond of (though not entirely sold on) the idea that our bodies are just receptors for souls (memetic beings?) to move in and out of. I think the idea came from the Aztecs, or at least my garbled misunderstanding of them. Anyway, with you 100% on this one. I'm always a ball of contradictory opinions, my husband will attest to this.
Maybe. I still have no idea what 'I' is.
As far as I can tell, I'm six different patterns of electrical activity fighting over a spongy tentacles monster controlling a meat suit.
Peterson would prolly call these gods, and then the mediator or ego ur talking about would be the highest god like yahweh or whatever. But how can I know that the thing doing the mediating is that, and not some usurper imitating it? Isn’t that like the whole gnostic problem
So simple, yet so powerful. I guess. Will apply.
You mean WINGMEN
Sometimes they call It inconscious, sometimes they call them archetypes, sometimes they call them cognitive schemese. Here in the swamps we call It THE VOID.
What benefit do you gain from actually acknowledging your psyche works like this beyond the fact that it more truly expresses what you're feeling?
I'm fond of (though not entirely sold on) the idea that our bodies are just receptors for souls (memetic beings?) to move in and out of. I think the idea came from the Aztecs, or at least my garbled misunderstanding of them. Anyway, with you 100% on this one. I'm always a ball of contradictory opinions, my husband will attest to this.